4/1/2023 0 Comments Color oracle color test![]() The longer this fantasy remains unfulfilled, the greater and more lasting is your disappointment. The satisfaction of your desire for material wellbeing and sensual pleasure is of particular importance to you because you believe these will bring you a special feeling of happiness. You apply a great deal of cleverness, time and energy in the realization of your promising plans. For me, I took the test thinking that.Īt the present time, your behavior is characterized by your need to have your dreams come true. Seems harmless until your results roll in. There is a selection of colors and you have to sort them based on what is most appealing to you and what is unpleasant to look at. Don’t believe me? Take the test for yourself here. The Color Oracle test, designed by Johannes Schneider, seemed harmless when people started sharing it on Tumblr but now, everyone is freaking out about how accurate it is. The internet loves tests that tell you about yourself and now there is a Color Oracle test that pinpoints everything about you by colors. Īnother similar issues is when i use ACR (version 9.By Rachel Leishman 6 years ago Follow Tweet Long story short, WPV and Bridge show me similar results when viewing edited images especially, while PS does it somewhat differently, and let's say it does it much better than the other two! ie, PS does show subtle differences clearly when, say, an image is made up of several layers and then if it's saved in Merged format of the layers too, while if i view the two merged and non-merged files separately in WPB or side by side in Bridge, the two images show up the same. (at times i do professional work too, with not much complaint from the clients who usually use regular-grade PC setups and totally different monitors on lower color / contrast / resolution settings. ) -)īack to the Windows Photo Viewer vs Bridge/Photoshop comparisons, i still use PS CS6 and its related Bridge for most of my image editing jobs on an almost daily basis. ![]() ![]() yes, i know: the latter is 'out of fashion' these days but i have my own silly reason for using it occasionally! didn't test Chrome and others because i don't use them a lot anyway. )īefore getting into that though, let's say IE11 is showing the same color / contrast results to me as does Firefox. not so great but much better than majority of the low to medium priced 1080 video monitors out there. (Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit on a not so new yet quite a powerful X58 mobo + 24GB memory blah blah machine built less than 5 years ago. Many thanks as i can see some really useful info / tests etc here!īut i have an almost different problem regarding how Windows Photo Viewer handles the same image files as Photoshop AND Bridge. Mine's undergoing updates, the current version's at Neil It must be reading the ProPhoto tag unless I am misunderstanding how you've configured the test? ![]() Interestingly, there's no difference between the ProPhoto RGB and sRGB elements illustrated.Īlso the tagged/ untagged comparison passes the "looks identical" test. ![]() I wonder if the wacked profile you made and mention on the Firefox thread might be at play here? Your "use of profiles" tests (used on a retina iPad) indicate that neither ICC v2 or v4 profiles are supported on iPad, that's on neither Safari, nor Chrome. These days, though, with reports coming from clients of their endusers il advisedly viewing and assesing image quality/colour on devices as random as even Blackberries I guess thought and policy is needed! Not that the Blackberry will ever pass muster for this. This is not something I've put much thought into 'til now, mainly advising a default colourspace for iPad display of images in portfolios etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |